Editorial · the publisher
About Wolverine MD
A status board for the BPC-157 TB-500 literature — what it is, and what it is not.
What this site is
Wolverine MD is a status board for the peer-reviewed research on BPC-157 TB-500 — the two-peptide tissue-repair blend the research community calls Wolverine. No clinic sits behind it and no clinician is on staff; it diagnoses no one and prescribes nothing. Nothing is made, sold, or shipped from here. Its work is reading published science and posting each finding beside the study that recorded it.
The site is built as a two-channel research console: BPC-157 findings are tracked on one channel and TB-500 findings on another, each logged to its source, with the combined human readouts left deliberately blank because no controlled combination study exists. That structure is the point — it keeps single-compound animal evidence from being read as evidence for the blend.
What "MD" means here, and what it does not
The "MD" in the domain name names a reading posture, not a service on offer. It sets the measured, instrument-panel register in which this site reads the literature — a status board of the evidence — and nothing more. It does not mean the site is a medical practice, that it offers consultation, treatment, or prescriptions, or that a physician staffs it. There are no "our doctors," no clinical team, and no physical clinic.
We take no position on whether anyone should use the blend. We describe what specific studies measured, in which species, at which doses, and we flag — on every page — where the combination's human evidence is simply absent. Where regulatory facts appear, they are stated in the present tense and cited to FDA, and future agency action is never presented as settled.
How the content is sourced
Every quantitative claim on this site maps to a numbered entry in the BPC-157 TB-500 research findings register — a real study with a DOI or PubMed link, or an FDA page for regulatory facts. Animal doses are reported as animal doses, expressed per body weight in the species studied. We do not convert them into human guidance, and we do not publish protocols.
The editorial line is consistent across the portfolio of which this site is part: lead with what the research established, attribute it precisely, and leave the gaps visible. For the blend, the largest gap is the most important fact about it — and we keep it in view rather than papering over it.